Human Anatomy — all lessons
Foundations of Anatomy
Anatomical terminology, planes, axes and movement directionsThe Skeletal System
Skeletal system: structure and functionsBone structure, remodelling and adaptation to loadingJoints and the Muscular System
Joint types and classificationJoint mechanics: arthrokinematics and stabilityThe muscular system: organisation and major muscle groupsMuscle architecture: pennation, length and cross-sectional areaMuscle fibre typesRegional Functional Anatomy
Spine and postureThe shoulder complexThe hip complexThe knee complexThe ankle and foot complexCore and pelvic stabilityElbow and wrist functional anatomyCervical and thoracic spine functional anatomyJoint mechanics: arthrokinematics and stability
How joint surfaces roll, glide and spin, what holds joints together, and how this informs exercise selection and progression.
Learning objectives
- Distinguish osteokinematics from arthrokinematics
- Describe roll, glide and spin and the convex–concave principle, including its limits
- Explain passive, active and neural contributions to joint stability
- Use close-packed and open-packed positions and degrees of freedom in exercise decisions
Before this lesson
Why this matters
Two people can perform the same squat with very different joint mechanics. Understanding what happens inside the joint and what keeps it stable underpins injury prevention, rehabilitation and coaching cues.
Fundamental concepts
- Osteokinematics — movement of bones through planes (flexion, abduction, rotation) — covered in planes and axes.
- Arthrokinematics — movement between joint surfaces [neumann2017]:
- Roll — new points on one surface contact new points on the other (a tyre rolling).
- Glide (slide) — one point slides across new points (a braked tyre skidding).
- Spin — one point rotates on a single point (a spinning top).
The convex–concave principle
- Convex surface moving on a fixed concave surface → roll and glide in opposite directions (e.g., humeral head on glenoid during abduction: rolls up, glides down, staying centred).
- Concave surface moving on a fixed convex surface → roll and glide in the same direction (e.g., tibia on femur in open-chain knee extension).
This is a useful mental model, but imaging studies show joints do not always behave as the rule predicts — translations depend on muscle activity, capsule tightness and load. Treat it as a guide rather than a law [neumann2017].
Joint stability
Stability = the ability to maintain or return to a controlled position under load. It comes from four overlapping sources:
| Source | Examples |
|---|---|
| Bony congruence | Deep hip socket; shallow glenoid |
| Passive tissues | Ligaments, capsule, labrum, menisci |
| Active (muscular) | Rotator cuff compressing the humeral head; hamstrings resisting anterior tibial translation |
| Neural control | Proprioception, reflexes and planned muscle activation timing |
Close-packed positions (maximal congruence, ligaments taut — e.g., full knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion) are stable but poor at absorbing force. Open (loose)-packed positions allow more accessory motion.
Practical application
Common mistakes and misconceptions
- “Mobility joints vs stability joints.” The popular “joint-by-joint” model can be a useful teaching heuristic, but every joint needs both mobility and control for the task.
- “Clicking means instability.” Painless noises are common and usually benign.
Case study
Athlete: a 24-year-old basketball player with two right ankle sprains this season. Strength testing is normal, but single-leg balance with eyes closed is poor on the right. The coach adds progressive balance, hop-and-stick and reactive drills alongside strength — targeting the neural component of stability — and liaises with the physiotherapist on return to sport testing.
Further learning: video lessons
Video links are only marked “verified” after a human has watched them. Unverified entries open a YouTube search for that channel and topic rather than a guessed link.
Arthrokinematics: roll, glide and spin
Physiotutors
You will understand: joint surface motion and the convex–concave principle
Why: Physiotherapy-focused, clinically relevant.
Joint stability: static vs dynamic stabilisers
Kenhub
You will understand: how bones, ligaments and muscles share stabilising roles
Why: Clear anatomical visuals.
Knowledge check
Knowledge check · 0/5
1. When a convex surface moves on a fixed concave surface (e.g., humeral head in glenoid), the classic rule says roll and glide occur…
2. The close-packed position of a joint is when…
3. Which is an active (muscular) contributor to stability?
4. Proprioceptive deficits after an ankle sprain mainly affect which stability system?
5. Which statement about the convex–concave rule is most accurate?
Short-answer & application questions
- Describe the stabilisers of the knee in each category (bony, passive, active, neural).
- Why is full knee extension (close-packed) a less suitable position to absorb landing forces?
- Explain to a client why “joint stability” training includes balance and reaction drills, not just strength.
Key takeaways
- Osteokinematics describes bone movement in planes; arthrokinematics describes surface motion (roll, glide, spin) inside the joint.
- The convex–concave principle is a useful guide, but imaging shows real joints do not always follow it.
- Stability comes from bone shape, passive tissues (ligaments, capsule, labrum, menisci), muscles and neuromuscular control.
- Mobility and stability are not opposites to be traded globally; each task needs controlled motion at each joint.
Connected topics
The knee complex
anatomyThe shoulder complex
biomechanicsLevers, torque and moment arms
prehab rehabPrinciples of injury prevention and recovery
corrective exerciseCorrective strategies: inhibitory, lengthening, activation and mobility
References
- Neumann DA (2017). Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System: Foundations for Rehabilitation (3rd ed.). Elsevier. Textbook check pending
- Betts JG, Young KA, Wise JA, et al. (2022). Anatomy and Physiology 2e — Chapter 9: Joints. OpenStax, Rice University. · Link Textbook check pending
- Doherty C, Delahunt E, Caulfield B, et al. (2014). The incidence and prevalence of ankle sprain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective epidemiological studies. Sports Medicine, 44(1):123–140. doi:10.1007/s40279-013-0102-5 Meta-analysis check pending
Educational content only — not medical advice. Consult a qualified clinician for diagnosis or treatment.