Assessment & Screening — all lessons
Screening
Preparticipation health screeningResting and Body Composition Measures
Resting assessments and anthropometric measurementsFitness Testing
Cardiorespiratory assessmentsMuscular strength, endurance and power assessmentsAthlete assessment and evaluationMovement and Postural Assessment
Postural and functional assessment (Prehab assessment tool)Limits of movement screens and postural assessmentMuscular strength, endurance and power assessments
How to test strength (1RM and estimates), muscular endurance, power (jumps) and grip — protocols, safety, reliability and what the numbers mean.
Learning objectives
- Conduct a safe 1RM or repetition-maximum test and estimate 1RM
- Administer common endurance tests (push-up, chair stand, plank)
- Measure power using vertical jump variants
- Use grip strength as a health marker and interpret results
Before this lesson
Why this matters
Strength, endurance and power each predict different things — performance, independence in older age, even mortality. Testing them well gives a baseline for programming and a powerful motivator.
Strength
1RM protocol (typical): general warm-up → ~5–10 reps at ~50% estimated 1RM → 3–5 reps at ~70% → 1–2 at ~80–90% → single attempts with 3–5 min rest, increasing load until failure, aiming to find 1RM within 3–5 attempts. 1RM testing shows high test–retest reliability when standardised [grgic2020].
For beginners, use a repetition maximum (e.g., 5RM) and estimate 1RM with the 1RM estimator.
Muscular endurance
- Push-up test — maximal reps with a defined standard (e.g., chest to a fist-height target, full lockout, no pauses); modified knee version available.
- 30-second chair stand — useful for older adults (see functional assessment).
- Plank / trunk endurance holds — useful but technique failure criteria must be clear.
Power
- Countermovement jump (CMJ) — dip and jump with hands on hips; measure with jump mat, app or force plate.
- Squat jump (SJ) — from a held squat, no dip; isolates concentric power. CMJ and SJ show high reliability [markovic2004]. CMJ minus SJ reflects stretch-shortening ability — see force and SSC.
Grip strength
Measured with a handheld dynamometer (standardised posture, best of 2–3 attempts per hand). In the PURE study of nearly 140,000 adults in 17 countries, each 5 kg lower grip strength was associated with ~16% higher all-cause mortality [leong2015]. Grip is a marker of overall strength and health — an association, not proof that grip training extends life.
Practical application
Common mistakes and misconceptions
Case study
A 70-year-old client completes 9 chair stands in 30 s and a grip of 18 kg. The trainer explains these indicate room to improve, builds a strength and power programme, and re-tests after 12 weeks (13 stands, 21 kg).
Further learning: video lessons
Video links are only marked “verified” after a human has watched them. Unverified entries open a YouTube search for that channel and topic rather than a guessed link.
How to perform a 1RM test safely
NSCA
You will understand: warm-up progression and attempt selection
Why: Professional standard procedure.
Grip strength testing with a dynamometer
physiotherapy channels (search)
You will understand: position and scoring
Why: Standardisation matters for comparison.
Knowledge check
Knowledge check · 0/5
1. For a novice client, which approach to strength assessment is usually most appropriate?
2. Reliability of 1RM testing in a systematic review was…
3. In the PURE study, each 5 kg lower grip strength was associated with…
4. A countermovement jump differs from a squat jump because it…
5. Why must push-up test standards be identical on re-test?
Short-answer & application questions
- Write a standardised 1RM protocol including warm-up and rest intervals.
- Explain why grip strength is used in older-adult assessments.
- Compare CMJ and squat jump results and what their difference suggests.
Key takeaways
- 1RM testing is reliable when standardised; repetition-maximum estimates are safer for beginners.
- Muscular endurance tests (push-ups, chair stands) are simple but technique standards must be consistent.
- Countermovement and squat jumps provide practical power measures.
- Lower grip strength is associated with higher all-cause mortality in large cohort studies.
Connected topics
Athlete assessment and evaluation
geriatric fitnessFunctional fitness assessment: SFT, SPPB, TUG, gait speed, grip
sports technologyDynamometry
strength conditioningProgressive overload and programming variables (sets, reps, tempo)
This is the canonical lesson for: Personal Training (ACE-aligned) → Assessments, Programming and Progressions
References
- Grgic J, Lazinica B, Schoenfeld BJ, Pedisic Z (2020). Test–retest reliability of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength assessment: a systematic review. Sports Medicine — Open, 6(1):31. Systematic review check pending
- Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. (2015). Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. The Lancet, 386(9990):266–273. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6 Cohort check pending
- Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I, Cardinale M (2004). Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(3):551–555. Cohort check pending
Educational content only — not medical advice. Consult a qualified clinician for diagnosis or treatment.