Assessment & Screening — all lessons

Muscular strength, endurance and power assessments

How to test strength (1RM and estimates), muscular endurance, power (jumps) and grip — protocols, safety, reliability and what the numbers mean.

Intermediate Evidence: Strong evidence 3 min read Reviewed 2026-10-31 Status: draft

Learning objectives

  • Conduct a safe 1RM or repetition-maximum test and estimate 1RM
  • Administer common endurance tests (push-up, chair stand, plank)
  • Measure power using vertical jump variants
  • Use grip strength as a health marker and interpret results

Before this lesson

Why this matters

Strength, endurance and power each predict different things — performance, independence in older age, even mortality. Testing them well gives a baseline for programming and a powerful motivator.

Strength

1RM protocol (typical): general warm-up → ~5–10 reps at ~50% estimated 1RM → 3–5 reps at ~70% → 1–2 at ~80–90% → single attempts with 3–5 min rest, increasing load until failure, aiming to find 1RM within 3–5 attempts. 1RM testing shows high test–retest reliability when standardised [grgic2020].

For beginners, use a repetition maximum (e.g., 5RM) and estimate 1RM with the 1RM estimator.

Muscular endurance

  • Push-up test — maximal reps with a defined standard (e.g., chest to a fist-height target, full lockout, no pauses); modified knee version available.
  • 30-second chair stand — useful for older adults (see functional assessment).
  • Plank / trunk endurance holds — useful but technique failure criteria must be clear.

Power

  • Countermovement jump (CMJ) — dip and jump with hands on hips; measure with jump mat, app or force plate.
  • Squat jump (SJ) — from a held squat, no dip; isolates concentric power. CMJ and SJ show high reliability [markovic2004]. CMJ minus SJ reflects stretch-shortening ability — see force and SSC.

Grip strength

Measured with a handheld dynamometer (standardised posture, best of 2–3 attempts per hand). In the PURE study of nearly 140,000 adults in 17 countries, each 5 kg lower grip strength was associated with ~16% higher all-cause mortality [leong2015]. Grip is a marker of overall strength and health — an association, not proof that grip training extends life.

Practical application

Common mistakes and misconceptions

Case study

A 70-year-old client completes 9 chair stands in 30 s and a grip of 18 kg. The trainer explains these indicate room to improve, builds a strength and power programme, and re-tests after 12 weeks (13 stands, 21 kg).

Further learning: video lessons

Video links are only marked “verified” after a human has watched them. Unverified entries open a YouTube search for that channel and topic rather than a guessed link.

Knowledge check

Knowledge check · 0/5

1. For a novice client, which approach to strength assessment is usually most appropriate?

Answer B. Estimates from submaximal sets are safer while technique develops.

2. Reliability of 1RM testing in a systematic review was…

Answer B. Grgic et al. (2020) reported high test–retest reliability across many studies.

3. In the PURE study, each 5 kg lower grip strength was associated with…

Answer B. Leong et al. (2015) found grip strength inversely associated with mortality.

4. A countermovement jump differs from a squat jump because it…

Answer B. The dip uses the stretch-shortening cycle.

5. Why must push-up test standards be identical on re-test?

Answer B. Technique variation is a major source of measurement error.

Short-answer & application questions

  1. Write a standardised 1RM protocol including warm-up and rest intervals.
  2. Explain why grip strength is used in older-adult assessments.
  3. Compare CMJ and squat jump results and what their difference suggests.

Key takeaways

  • 1RM testing is reliable when standardised; repetition-maximum estimates are safer for beginners.
  • Muscular endurance tests (push-ups, chair stands) are simple but technique standards must be consistent.
  • Countermovement and squat jumps provide practical power measures.
  • Lower grip strength is associated with higher all-cause mortality in large cohort studies.

Connected topics

This is the canonical lesson for: Personal Training (ACE-aligned) → Assessments, Programming and Progressions

References

  1. Grgic J, Lazinica B, Schoenfeld BJ, Pedisic Z (2020). Test–retest reliability of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength assessment: a systematic review. Sports Medicine — Open, 6(1):31. Systematic review check pending
  2. Leong DP, Teo KK, Rangarajan S, et al. (2015). Prognostic value of grip strength: findings from the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study. The Lancet, 386(9990):266–273. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62000-6 Cohort check pending
  3. Markovic G, Dizdar D, Jukic I, Cardinale M (2004). Reliability and factorial validity of squat and countermovement jump tests. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 18(3):551–555. Cohort check pending

Educational content only — not medical advice. Consult a qualified clinician for diagnosis or treatment.