Assessment & Screening — all lessons
Screening
Preparticipation health screeningResting and Body Composition Measures
Resting assessments and anthropometric measurementsFitness Testing
Cardiorespiratory assessmentsMuscular strength, endurance and power assessmentsAthlete assessment and evaluationMovement and Postural Assessment
Postural and functional assessment (Prehab assessment tool)Limits of movement screens and postural assessmentResting assessments and anthropometric measurements
Resting heart rate and blood pressure, height, body mass, BMI, waist measures and body-composition methods — how to measure them well and interpret them honestly.
Learning objectives
- Measure resting heart rate and blood pressure using standardised technique
- Classify blood pressure using current categories and know when to refer
- Measure height, mass, waist and calculate BMI and waist-to-height ratio
- Compare body-composition methods and their errors
Before this lesson
Why this matters
Resting measures provide a baseline, flag people who need referral, and track progress. Their value depends entirely on measuring consistently and interpreting within their limits.
Resting heart rate
Measure after ≥5 minutes of seated or lying rest (ideally on waking), for 30–60 s by palpation or a reliable monitor. Track averages over several days.
Blood pressure
Technique [whelton2018]: seated with back supported, feet flat, legs uncrossed, arm supported at heart level, correct cuff size, ≥5 minutes rest, no caffeine/exercise/smoking for 30 minutes, no talking. Take ≥2 readings 1–2 minutes apart and average.
| Category (AHA/ACC 2017) | Systolic | Diastolic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | <120 | and | <80 |
| Elevated | 120–129 | and | <80 |
| Stage 1 hypertension | 130–139 | or | 80–89 |
| Stage 2 hypertension | ≥140 | or | ≥90 |
Other countries’ guidelines (e.g., European, Indian) use different thresholds — follow local guidance for referral.
Anthropometrics
- Height (stadiometer, shoes off) and body mass (same scale, same time of day, minimal clothing).
- BMI = mass ÷ height² (kg/m²). WHO categories: <18.5 underweight, 18.5–24.9 normal, 25–29.9 overweight, ≥30 obesity. A WHO expert consultation identified lower public-health action points (23 and 27.5) for many Asian populations [who2004].
- Waist circumference — measured at a standardised site (e.g., midpoint between lowest rib and iliac crest) at end of normal expiration.
- Waist-to-height ratio — ≥0.5 indicates increased cardiometabolic risk; it outperformed BMI and waist alone in a meta-analysis [ashwell2012]. Try the BMI & WHtR calculator.
Body composition methods
| Method | Notes |
|---|---|
| DXA | Clinical/research reference; regional data; cost, low radiation |
| Skinfolds | Cheap; skill-dependent; equations (e.g., Jackson–Pollock) are population-specific [jackson1978] |
| BIA | Quick; strongly affected by hydration, food, exercise, skin temperature |
| Circumferences | Simple and reliable for tracking change |
All field methods have individual errors of several percentage points of body fat. Track trends with the same method, technician and conditions.
Practical application
Common mistakes and misconceptions
Case study
A 40-year-old client’s first BP reading is 148/92 mmHg after rushing to the gym. After 5 minutes’ rest with correct technique, readings average 136/86. The trainer explains this is in the stage 1 range, recommends a GP visit for diagnosis, and begins light–moderate aerobic and resistance exercise in the meantime as per screening guidance.
Further learning: video lessons
Video links are only marked “verified” after a human has watched them. Unverified entries open a YouTube search for that channel and topic rather than a guessed link.
How to measure blood pressure correctly
American Heart Association
You will understand: standardised BP measurement technique
Why: From the guideline-issuing organisation.
Skinfold measurement technique
exercise science labs (search)
You will understand: site location and pinch technique
Why: Technique drives accuracy.
Knowledge check
Knowledge check · 0/5
1. According to AHA/ACC 2017, a reading of 134/84 mmHg is…
2. Which factor will falsely raise a blood pressure reading?
3. Waist-to-height ratio of 0.5 or more indicates…
4. Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) readings are particularly affected by…
5. Why do many Asian guidelines use a lower BMI threshold for overweight?
Short-answer & application questions
- Write a step-by-step protocol for measuring resting blood pressure.
- Explain to a muscular rugby player why his BMI classifies him as “obese”.
- Which body-composition method would you choose for monthly tracking in a gym, and how would you standardise it?
Key takeaways
- Standardised conditions (rest, posture, cuff size, timing) are essential for useful resting measures.
- AHA/ACC 2017 categories — normal <120/<80; elevated 120–129/<80; stage 1 130–139 or 80–89; stage 2 ≥140 or ≥90 mmHg.
- BMI is a population screening tool; waist-to-height ratio adds information about central fat.
- All field body-composition methods have meaningful error; track trends with the same method.
Connected topics
Stroke volume, heart rate and cardiac output
metabolic healthHypertension training guidelines
metabolic healthObesity training guidelines
lifestyle nutritionCalorie balance and metabolism
This is the canonical lesson for: Personal Training (ACE-aligned) → Assessments, Programming and Progressions
References
- Whelton PK, Carey RM, Aronow WS, et al. (2018). 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults. Hypertension, 71(6):e13–e115. doi:10.1161/HYP.0000000000000065 Guideline check pending
- WHO Expert Consultation (2004). Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. The Lancet, 363(9403):157–163. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3 Guideline check pending
- Ashwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S (2012). Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist circumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obesity Reviews, 13(3):275–286. doi:10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00952.x Meta-analysis check pending
- Jackson AS, Pollock ML (1978). Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. British Journal of Nutrition, 40(3):497–504. Classic study check pending
Educational content only — not medical advice. Consult a qualified clinician for diagnosis or treatment.